<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://misc.tbgforums.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=29&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Miscellaneous Forums / Your opinion on Scratch 1.4 vs 2.0]]></title>
		<link>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?id=29</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Your opinion on Scratch 1.4 vs 2.0.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2022 13:45:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Your opinion on Scratch 1.4 vs 2.0]]></title>
			<link>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1194#p1194</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>i didn&#039;t even know about scratch when 1.4 existed<br />but when i look through the archives i see it was a very friendly site.<br />nowdays, people get banned for the smallest things.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (SiIvaGunner)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2022 13:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1194#p1194</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Your opinion on Scratch 1.4 vs 2.0]]></title>
			<link>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1170#p1170</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>__init__ wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>I really miss 1.4 now. The community was so much better, people didn&#039;t get banned just for doing tiny things, etc. 2.0 has more features, a nicer website, vector graphics - but with that came a gigantic community, which I don&#039;t necessarily like. I liked it better as a small, [relatively] quiet site.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>This post didn&#039;t exactly age well with the release of 3.0. With 2.0 it at least had some kind of unique community, while with 3.0 we got nothing</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (the2000)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2019 22:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1170#p1170</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Your opinion on Scratch 1.4 vs 2.0]]></title>
			<link>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1169#p1169</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#039;t around during 1.4, but 2.0 was definitely better than 3.0.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (redgreenandblue)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 18:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1169#p1169</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Your opinion on Scratch 1.4 vs 2.0]]></title>
			<link>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1126#p1126</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I really miss 1.4 now. The community was so much better, people didn&#039;t get banned just for doing tiny things, etc. 2.0 has more features, a nicer website, vector graphics - but with that came a gigantic community, which I don&#039;t necessarily like. I liked it better as a small, [relatively] quiet site.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (__init__)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 20:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1126#p1126</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Your opinion on Scratch 1.4 vs 2.0]]></title>
			<link>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1119#p1119</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I like the general big additions made to 2.0. However, the small quality of life things from 1.4 are sorely missing. Larger selection of fonts, various shift-click/right-click functions, etc. It seems like smaller old elements were neglected in the emphasis on the new things.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (soupoftomato)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 01:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1119#p1119</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Your opinion on Scratch 1.4 vs 2.0]]></title>
			<link>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1115#p1115</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>2.0 is better in many ways, but I still prefer using 1.4, because it&#039;s what I&#039;ve used for over 7 years now, and 2.0 pretty much killed off modding.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (bm7)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 19:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1115#p1115</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Your opinion on Scratch 1.4 vs 2.0]]></title>
			<link>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1100#p1100</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>i think additional fonts do work in 2.0, just as long as you don&#039;t try to edit them with an editor that doesn&#039;t have those fonts</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Carl)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1100#p1100</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Your opinion on Scratch 1.4 vs 2.0]]></title>
			<link>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1098#p1098</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>elfin8er wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><div class="quotebox"><cite>jji7skyline wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>The one thing I don&#039;t like about 2.0 is that there&#039;s not many instruments and fonts.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Huh. Never even noticed that. I wonder... if you would set it up correctly, could one create a 2.0 mod that includes fonts and sounds from 1.4, and could they be uploaded to the Scratch website? I&#039;d imagine so...</p></div></blockquote></div><p>New fonts wouldn&#039;t work in Scratch unless you convert the text to paths, and new instruments wouldn&#039;t work at all.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (djdolphin)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 12:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1098#p1098</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Your opinion on Scratch 1.4 vs 2.0]]></title>
			<link>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1096#p1096</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>jji7skyline wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>The one thing I don&#039;t like about 2.0 is that there&#039;s not many instruments and fonts.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Huh. Never even noticed that. I wonder... if you would set it up correctly, could one create a 2.0 mod that includes fonts and sounds from 1.4, and could they be uploaded to the Scratch website? I&#039;d imagine so...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (elfin8er)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 05:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1096#p1096</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Your opinion on Scratch 1.4 vs 2.0]]></title>
			<link>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1093#p1093</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>jji7skyline wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>The one thing I don&#039;t like about 2.0 is that there&#039;s not many instruments and fonts.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>that&#039;s true. the previous midi library (scratch.mit edu/projects/721904/) was great compared to the 4 or 5 instruments available in flash for 2.0</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Carl)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 03:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1093#p1093</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Your opinion on Scratch 1.4 vs 2.0]]></title>
			<link>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1092#p1092</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The one thing I don&#039;t like about 2.0 is that there&#039;s not many instruments and fonts.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (jji7skyline)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 01:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1092#p1092</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Your opinion on Scratch 1.4 vs 2.0]]></title>
			<link>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1090#p1090</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>elfin8er wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Still not really seeing what makes it so confusing? It&#039;s a LOT like 1.4... just an updated look.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I dunno.. maybe nostalgia?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (jji10dino)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2015 22:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1090#p1090</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Your opinion on Scratch 1.4 vs 2.0]]></title>
			<link>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1079#p1079</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Still not really seeing what makes it so confusing? It&#039;s a LOT like 1.4... just an updated look.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (elfin8er)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2015 06:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1079#p1079</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Your opinion on Scratch 1.4 vs 2.0]]></title>
			<link>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1069#p1069</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>April wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>I dunno, I&#039;ve used Scratch 1.4 a lot and I just started using the 2.0 editor a bit and I don&#039;t find it confusing and like it very much.</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Same.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (__init__)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 19:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1069#p1069</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Your opinion on Scratch 1.4 vs 2.0]]></title>
			<link>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1068#p1068</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, I&#039;ve used Scratch 1.4 a lot and I just started using the 2.0 editor a bit and I don&#039;t find it confusing and like it very much.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (April)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 19:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1068#p1068</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
