<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://misc.tbgforums.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;fid=4&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Miscellaneous Forums / Announcements]]></title>
		<link>http://misc.tbgforums.com/index.php</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent topics at Miscellaneous Forums.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 04:58:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Look At Me]]></title>
			<link>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?id=161&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>u r welcum</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (dog)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 04:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?id=161&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Guidelines for the New Miscellaneous forum]]></title>
			<link>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?id=14&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Note: As this forum is still evolving and growing, so are its guidelines. This thread will also serve to keep track of official stances on certain rules, as interpreted by the Scratch Team.</strong></p><div class="quotebox"><cite>Sunrise-Moon wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Since this is no longer connected with Scratch, I propose that we get rid of the &quot;on-topic&quot; requirement for posts. Misc. is about just hanging out and discussing things and if a certain discussion topic strays from the original post&#039;s topic, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s necessarily a bad thing. And likely, it won&#039;t really disrupt flow of conversation because typically, any particular topic will slowly veer &quot;off-topic&quot;. But just because it&#039;s off-topic, doesn&#039;t mean that it&#039;s not worthwhile. It&#039;s just how like in real life people typically don&#039;t talk about the same thing for hours and hours: instead, they let the conversation ebb and flow and one topic will usually lead to another.</p></div></blockquote></div><div class="quotebox"><cite>April wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>I think it&#039;s okay if threads go somewhat or fairly off-topic, but I think there should still be focus on the topic of a thread and also no threads created without a central topic. But discussion beyond a topic (esp. if somehow related, even if only tangentially).</p></div></blockquote></div><p>----------</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (April)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://misc.tbgforums.com/viewtopic.php?id=14&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
